Philine auriformis on the California coast
June 9, 1998
From: Michelle Chow
Hi, I am a graduate student from San Francisco State University. For my thesis, I am interested in the introduced opisthobranch, Philine auriformis on the California coast. This organism, also called the tortellini snail, is native to New Zealand and was first identified in San Francisco Bay in July 1993. By 1994 it was regularly collected in SF Bay and also north in Bodega Bay.
The introduction probably occured through transport of ballast water. Currently Philine is also present in Monterey Bay and along the southern California bight in the open coast. The literature about this particular invasion is thin, therefore most of my information is through word of mouth. I am hoping that this letter will elicit information about the ecology of Philine auriformis in its native region. The concern in San Francisco Bay is that Philine is just one of the many introduced species that have arrived here is the past decade. The outcome of most of these introductions is unknown. Philine feeds on small bivalves (Gemma gemma in San Francisco Bay and Nutricula sp. (=Transennella) in Bodega Bay) which comprise the diet of many native invertebrates and shore birds. I am hoping to perform experiments to determine the impact of Philine on the benthic fauna.
Several of my questions are:
1) I know Philine auriformis is found both in the intertidal and subtidal. How deep is Philine normally found?
2) In the literature, Philine is said to be a burrower. At what depth are they found in the substrate. Is this due to presence of a food resource? They prey on Nucula hartvigiana in New Zealand, can you tell me a little about where Nucula is found? What other types of prey items does it consume?
3) How big are their egg cases? I am still trying to collect an egg mass for positive identification.
4) Are there known predators of Philine auriformis? So far there seem to be little consumers of Philine in Calif.
I am sure that I will have more questions as I continue reading the literature. Anyone who has seen Philine, feel free to email me. All information will be of use as I try to get a handle on their ecology in their new environment.
Thanks
Michelle Chow
Bodega Marine Laboratory
Bodega Bay, California, CA 94923
USA
mbond@ucdavis.edu
Chow, M., 1998 (Jun 9) Philine auriformis on the California coast. [Message in] Sea Slug Forum. Australian Museum, Sydney. Available from http://www.seaslugforum.net/find/170Your questions take me back to some of the first research I did on opisthobranchs in New Zealand. You seem to have found my published papers on Philine ( Numbers 5, 15, 16) in my list of publications.
For background information, philinids are bubble-shells which have specialised for burrowing through sand and mud. They have a very stream-lined body and the shell is reduced to a thin internal plate-like shell in the back "posterior shield" region of the body. In the photo above it covers the brownish digestive gland. The bright white region is the muscular gizzard which contains three large calcareous plates which are used to crush the shells of the bivalves it feeds on. Species of Philine show an interesting evolutionary progression through species with small chitinous plates to species like Philine angasi which has two huge calcareous plates and a small third plate. Philine auriformis has three identically shaped plates.
My main aim was to compare the functional anatomy of various common bullomorph or cephalaspidean opisthobranchs. We knew little about the biology of any species then and unfortunately there are still major gaps in our knowledge. I don't know of any subsequent studies in New Zealand on Philine auriformis. To answer some of your specific questions:
•As a burrower it is seldom seen unless you are specifically studying it. I remember digging up and seiving huge areas of sandy mudflats in search of Philine and being happy to find 8 or 9 specimens per low tide. The only subtidal records I know of are from dredge samples, the deepest to about 12 fathoms (=72 feet, = 22 meters), but that could be because that is the limit of small naturalist dredge operations. So I can't say what its natural limits are.
•Again I can't be sure how deep it burrows but in most substrates I sampled the sediment became anoxic below about 10 to 15 cms and neither Philine nor its food Nucula were found in such conditions. I am not an expert on nuculid bivalves but Nucula hartvigiana is very common close to the surface in the top couple of centimetres. It is found in fine muddy sands of estuaries and coarser sands of more open beaches.
•The jelly-like egg masses of Philine are about 2 centimetres long, and are anchored in the sand by a long thread. The individual eggs are arranged inside the egg mass in a coil.
•I know of no predators of Philine auriformis but at times the aglajid bubble-shell Philinopsis taronga, a well-known predator of bubble-shells, was commonly found in the same area. Perhaps in California such spectacular aglajids as the huge Aglaja inermis (Navanax) could be feeding on this antipodean invader.
It seems this work would be an excellent excuse to apply for a grant to study these animals in New Zealand.
A good reference is: Gosliner, T. 1995. The introduction and spread of Philine auriformis (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) from New Zealand to San Francisco Bay and Bodega Harbor. Marine Biology, 122: 249-255.
A summary of the invasion story has been prepared by Terry Gosliner .. Bill Rudman
Rudman, W.B., 1998 (Jun 9). Comment on Philine auriformis on the California coast by Michelle Chow. [Message in] Sea Slug Forum. Australian Museum, Sydney. Available from http://www.seaslugforum.net/find/170Related messages
-
Californian Philine - my last word?
From: Bill Rudman, August 11, 1998 -
Philine in California
From: Michelle Chow, August 6, 1998 -
Philine in California
From: Terry Gosliner, August 4, 1998 -
Philine in California
From: Mike Behrens, August 4, 1998 -
Philine penis correction!
From: Bill Rudman, August 4, 1998 -
Philine in California
From: Michelle Chow, July 31, 1998 -
Californian invader not P.auriformis
From: Bill Rudman, July 30, 1998 -
Re: Philine auriformis on the California coast
From: Michelle Chow, July 10, 1998 -
Re: Philine auriformis on the California coast
From: Michelle Chow, July 6, 1998 -
Re: Philine auriformis on the California coast
From: Michelle Chow, June 18, 1998 -
Re: Philine auriformis on the California coast
From: Michelle Chow, June 12, 1998