Re: What's wrong with Elysia clarki?
September 1, 2006
From: Skip Pierce
Concerning message #17670:
Hi Bill
The answer to your question is that, as you've answered it yourself, there is nothing wrong with E. clarki, especially if a comparison is made to the descriptions of several other elysiid species. I have not seen the book that you've reviewed, but from your comments, what is wrong here is the authors' opinion, which seems based on no new data, ignorance of the existing data and no research to support their opinion.
On the other hand, I think if you look at our paper describing E. clarki, you will find much more documentation, than regrettably, usually accompanies descriptions of elysiid species. Furthermore, our comparison of E. clarki with E. crispata covered many levels, from ecology, to feeding, to larval development, to symbiotic chloroplasts, to radular morphology, to digestive system morphology, to microscopic anatomy at both light and electron microscopic levels, to molecular biology - and the two species were consistently and, importantly, predictably different in EVERY characteristic in EVERY specimen - and we've looked at 1000s of specimens over many years - live and preserved. The differences hold up not only between E. crispata from the Virgin Islands and E. clarki, but also between E. crispata from Florida reefs and E. clarki, as well as among preserved specimens from a variety of locations - all of which we looked at. Not all are data is included in the published description because during a long and exhaustive gestation period, journal reviewers insisted, amongst other things, that the manuscript be shortened.
Some of the characters are subtle - but some, as you have mentioned, Bill -are major. In fact, the anterior gap vs fusion in the parapodia has been used by some authors as a genus-separating characteristic. According to some schemes, the fused parapodia suggest that E. crispata should not even be in Elysia. As you point out in your message, Bill, morphological and ecological characteristics of the two species do not overlap--ever. Furthermore, while we did not test any, the habitat differences between the two species imply an additional host of physiological and biochemical differences between them. All of that is why we decided to describe E. clarki as a distinct species. To simply invoke an opinion of population differences without any data to support it is merely arm waving. Instead, as you also point out, biochemistry, morphology and ecology are grounded in differences in DNA and, subsequently, proteomics. Such characteristics do not simply all appear or disappear at whim in every specimen in every population.
To come to a conclusion of synonomy without any data is naive and, I'm afraid, bad science. There are many taxonomic issues amongst the elysiids, many of which continually appear on the Forum and in the literature, that have been produced from over 150 years worth of opinions that have ignored data or not even bothered to collect data, but E. clarki is simply not one of them. I too would invite the book's authors to produce some data to support "intraspecific variability" - until then their synyomy is groundless.
Skip
pierce@cas.usf.edu
Pierce. S. K., 2006 (Sep 1) Re: What's wrong with Elysia clarki?. [Message in] Sea Slug Forum. Australian Museum, Sydney. Available from http://www.seaslugforum.net/find/17695Related messages
-
Relationship of Elysia diomedea and E. crispata
From: Patrick Krug, October 6, 2008 -
Elysia clarki feeding practices
From: Adam D'Agosto, December 6, 2007 -
Elysia clarki and E. crispata in Florida
From: Skip Pierce, October 10, 2007 -
Re: Elysia crispata in Cozumel, Mexico
From: Skip Pierce, February 2, 2007 -
Re: Elysia crispata in Cozumel, Mexico
From: Jim Lyle, February 2, 2007 -
Re: Elysia crispata in Cozumel, Mexico
From: Sean Kearney, February 2, 2007 -
Re: Elysia crispata in Cozumel, Mexico
From: Skip Pierce, February 1, 2007 -
Elysia crispata in Cozumel, Mexico
From: Sean Kearney, January 29, 2007 -
Elysia clarki feeding references
From: Nicholas Curtis, January 29, 2007 -
Re: What's wrong with Elysia clarki?
From: Colin Redfern, September 9, 2006 -
Re: What's wrong with Elysia clarki?
From: Colin Redfern, September 9, 2006 -
Re: What's wrong with Elysia clarki?
From: Skip Pierce, September 8, 2006 -
Re: What's wrong with Elysia clarki?
From: Angel Valdes, September 7, 2006 -
Re: Damaged Elysia crispata
From: Nick Curtis, August 31, 2006 -
What's wrong with Elysia clarki?
From: Bill Rudman, August 30, 2006 -
Elysia diomedea & E. clarki in home aquarium?
From: Matt Pedersen, May 30, 2006 -
Elysia clarki breeding in the home aquarium
From: Matt Pedersen, May 30, 2006 -
Elysia clarki, E. diomedea and E. crispata
From: Bill Rudman, May 30, 2006 -
A new Elysia from Florida
From: Bill Rudman, May 30, 2006 -
Lettuce Sea Slug behavior and feeding
From: Patrick Glenn, April 13, 2006 -
What to feed Elysia crispata?
From: Alexandra Ahnide, April 11, 2006 -
Elysia crispata feeding and babies
From: Willem Bermel, January 31, 2006 -
Re: Colour in Elysia (again)
From: Anne DuPont, November 7, 2005 -
Re: Lettuce sea slug - breeding success
From: Vincent, June 27, 2003 -
Lettuce sea slug - breeding success
From: Rick Hahn, May 31, 2003 -
Re: Gene transfer - Elysia crispata
From: Skip Pierce, May 5, 2003 -
Re: Algal genes in Elysia crispata
From: Philip Cromwell, May 3, 2003 -
Re: Elysia crispata and algal genes
From: Skip Pierce, May 3, 2003 -
Algal genes in Elysia crispata
From: Skip Pierce, May 2, 2003 -
Elysia crispata babies
From: Joe Bongiorno, December 30, 2002 -
Re: Baby slugs!
From: Joe Bongiorno, December 18, 2002 -
Re: Baby slugs!
From: Joe Bongiorno, December 10, 2002 -
Bifid rhinophores in Elysia crispata
From: Anna L. Bass, September 12, 2002 -
Elysia crispata? in aquaria
From: Ash, April 1, 2002 -
Re: Baby slugs! - Elysia crispata
From: Jeff Zimmerman, June 4, 2001 -
Re: Baby slugs! - Elysia crispata
From: Jeff Zimmerman, March 22, 2001 -
Baby slugs!
From: Jeff Zimmerman, March 17, 2001