Caulerpa prolifera
March 13, 2003
From: Rob Brown
I am researching the invasive Mediterranean strain of Caulerpa taxifolia and the possible biological control of it using Elysia subornata, and have recently been curious about another Mediterranean Caulerpa. Caulerpa prolifera is not invasive in the Mediterranean, however its name surely implies that was invasive whenever/wherever it was first described. I know this is tangentially related to sea slugs, however I was hoping someone out there might know why C. prolifera is called prolifera.
Thanks,
Rob Brown
robertb@princeton.edu
Brown, R., 2003 (Mar 13) Caulerpa prolifera. [Message in] Sea Slug Forum. Australian Museum, Sydney. Available from http://www.seaslugforum.net/find/9390Dear Rob,
Your question is definitely very tangential to sea slugs but it does involve scientific names so I'll have a go. Basically you should try and see if the original description explains the origin of the name.
You have to be very careful in trying to interpret or 'translate' scientific names as they don't always mean what they seem. For example the nudibranch Noumea haliclona does not feed on the sponge Haliclona after which it was mistakenly named. Similarly, although prolifera sounds as though it may have something to so with being prolific I suspect it is based on the word proliferous which in botany refers to plants which freely reproduce vegetatively - by budding, sometimes from unusual places, such as shoots appearing from flowers.
Both prolific and proliferous come from a Latin word for offspring.
I am concerned to hear people are still seriously considering using non-native sacoglossans as biological control agents in the Mediterranean. I thought there had been considerable work done in recent years to show that the sacoglossan feeding behaviour probably increases the spread of C. taxifolia by causing bits to break off the plant and grow. Also there are plenty of examples worldwide now to show that, just as on land, introducing marine organisms to new oceans can cause massive ecological damage. Also, there is no evidence anywhere in the world to show that any sacoglossan species controls the population of its natural food algae, so why should we think they would do it if we shifted them to another ocean and put them on a new food plant?
Best wishes
Bill Rudman
Related messages
-
Re: Eggs on Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Kathe R. Jensen, December 20, 2003 -
Eggs on Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Jeannine Dietz, December 19, 2003 -
Sea Slugs eating 'Killer Algae'
From: Emily, October 23, 2003 -
Do slugs eat Caulerpa taxifolia?
From: Ronnie, October 6, 2003 -
Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control
From: Thierry Thibaut, March 28, 2003 -
Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control
From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 21, 2003 -
Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control
From: Thierry Thibaut, March 20, 2003 -
Re: Caulerpa prolifera
From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 14, 2003 -
References for some sacoglossans
From: Thierry Thibaut, February 25, 2003 -
Re: Caulerpa toxins
From: Kathe R. Jensen, October 3, 2002 -
Caulerpa toxins
From: Madhavi Agrawal, September 30, 2002 -
Caulerpa taxifolia in Japan
From: Nishina Masayoshi, March 28, 2002 -
Caulerpa taxifolia in Japan... slug food?
From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 27, 2002 -
Caulerpa taxifolia - economical consequences
From: Hennes Zitzen, September 16, 2001 -
Re: Oxynoe and Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 20, 2001 -
Oxynoe and Caulerpa taxifolia
From: French students, March 16, 2001 -
Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Kathe R. Jensen, July 23, 2000 -
Thanks
From: James Cobb, July 23, 2000 -
Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Cynthia Trowbridge, July 22, 2000 -
Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Kathe R. Jensen, July 21, 2000 -
Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Dr. Cynthia Trowbridge, July 18, 2000 -
Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: James Cobb, July 17, 2000