Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control
March 21, 2003
From: Cynthia Trowbridge
Dear Bill and Thierry,
Thank you for your message, Thierry. Good to hear from you :-)
First, thank you for correcting me about the Caulerpa prolifera vs. racemosa ... I realized my error the minute I hit the send button on my message. I was about to send in a correction.
Second, Thierry, I admire your work very much. Indeed, I wish you would publish more as you are the leading person in the field with Caulerpa-feeding slugs.
Third, there are many labs working on the possibility of biological control with sacoglossans - I can think of at least 4 - so there is no need to personalize any comments.
Finally, you suggested that you consider that the Caulerpa-slug problem is different from other marine biological control cases in the public eye. Respectfully, I do not agree. As a resident of Oregon, one state away from where the field testing of insect-Spartina marine biological control is now happening, I can attest to the public feeling. In a state where crab harvest is a crucial part of our economy, I can attest to the public feeling about the proposed parasitic castrators that can change hosts from green crabs to native crabs.
Part of the issue of the Caulerpa-slug case is that too often the newspapers and other popular media state that the slugs are "the last hope" and "better than nothing". Most scientists would prefer to hear that feeding preference experiments have demonstrated that slugs are effective at reducing pest alga biomass, are highly specific, etc., etc. - thus indicating that it is a science-based management approach.
To quote a famous marine ecologist, "Ecology is no longer a spectator's sport": we need to get involved to solve problems. But, as scientists, we do need to ensure that the solutions are science-based. Thierry, I encourage you to keep publishing your science as your studies are essential to understanding the complex issue.
Thank you for considering my comments.
Cordially,
Cynthia
trowbric@onid.orst.edu
Trowbridge, C., 2003 (Mar 21) Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control. [Message in] Sea Slug Forum. Australian Museum, Sydney. Available from http://www.seaslugforum.net/find/9460Related messages
-
Re: Eggs on Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Kathe R. Jensen, December 20, 2003 -
Eggs on Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Jeannine Dietz, December 19, 2003 -
Sea Slugs eating 'Killer Algae'
From: Emily, October 23, 2003 -
Do slugs eat Caulerpa taxifolia?
From: Ronnie, October 6, 2003 -
Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control
From: Thierry Thibaut, March 28, 2003 -
Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control
From: Thierry Thibaut, March 20, 2003 -
Re: Caulerpa prolifera
From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 14, 2003 -
Caulerpa prolifera
From: Rob Brown, March 13, 2003 -
References for some sacoglossans
From: Thierry Thibaut, February 25, 2003 -
Re: Caulerpa toxins
From: Kathe R. Jensen, October 3, 2002 -
Caulerpa toxins
From: Madhavi Agrawal, September 30, 2002 -
Caulerpa taxifolia in Japan
From: Nishina Masayoshi, March 28, 2002 -
Caulerpa taxifolia in Japan... slug food?
From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 27, 2002 -
Caulerpa taxifolia - economical consequences
From: Hennes Zitzen, September 16, 2001 -
Re: Oxynoe and Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 20, 2001 -
Oxynoe and Caulerpa taxifolia
From: French students, March 16, 2001 -
Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Kathe R. Jensen, July 23, 2000 -
Thanks
From: James Cobb, July 23, 2000 -
Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Cynthia Trowbridge, July 22, 2000 -
Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Kathe R. Jensen, July 21, 2000 -
Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: Dr. Cynthia Trowbridge, July 18, 2000 -
Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
From: James Cobb, July 17, 2000