Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control

March 21, 2003
From: Cynthia Trowbridge

Dear Bill and Thierry,
Thank you for your message, Thierry. Good to hear from you :-)

First, thank you for correcting me about the Caulerpa prolifera vs. racemosa ... I realized my error the minute I hit the send button on my message. I was about to send in a correction.
Second, Thierry, I admire your work very much. Indeed, I wish you would publish more as you are the leading person in the field with Caulerpa-feeding slugs.
Third, there are many labs working on the possibility of biological control with sacoglossans - I can think of at least 4 - so there is no need to personalize any comments.

Finally, you suggested that you consider that the Caulerpa-slug problem is different from other marine biological control cases in the public eye. Respectfully, I do not agree. As a resident of Oregon, one state away from where the field testing of insect-Spartina marine biological control is now happening, I can attest to the public feeling. In a state where crab harvest is a crucial part of our economy, I can attest to the public feeling about the proposed parasitic castrators that can change hosts from green crabs to native crabs.

Part of the issue of the Caulerpa-slug case is that too often the newspapers and other popular media state that the slugs are "the last hope" and "better than nothing". Most scientists would prefer to hear that feeding preference experiments have demonstrated that slugs are effective at reducing pest alga biomass, are highly specific, etc., etc. - thus indicating that it is a science-based management approach.

To quote a famous marine ecologist, "Ecology is no longer a spectator's sport": we need to get involved to solve problems. But, as scientists, we do need to ensure that the solutions are science-based. Thierry, I encourage you to keep publishing your science as your studies are essential to understanding the complex issue.

Thank you for considering my comments.
Cordially,
Cynthia

trowbric@onid.orst.edu

Trowbridge, C., 2003 (Mar 21) Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control. [Message in] Sea Slug Forum. Australian Museum, Sydney. Available from http://www.seaslugforum.net/find/9460

Related messages

  1. Re: Eggs on Caulerpa taxifolia
    From: Kathe R. Jensen, December 20, 2003
  2. Eggs on Caulerpa taxifolia
    From: Jeannine Dietz, December 19, 2003
  3. Sea Slugs eating 'Killer Algae'
    From: Emily, October 23, 2003
  4. Do slugs eat Caulerpa taxifolia?
    From: Ronnie, October 6, 2003
  5. Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control
    From: Thierry Thibaut, March 28, 2003
  6. Re: Caulerpa prolifera & biological control
    From: Thierry Thibaut, March 20, 2003
  7. Re: Caulerpa prolifera
    From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 14, 2003
  8. Caulerpa prolifera
    From: Rob Brown, March 13, 2003
  9. References for some sacoglossans
    From: Thierry Thibaut, February 25, 2003
  10. Re: Caulerpa toxins
    From: Kathe R. Jensen, October 3, 2002
  11. Caulerpa toxins
    From: Madhavi Agrawal, September 30, 2002
  12. Caulerpa taxifolia in Japan
    From: Nishina Masayoshi, March 28, 2002
  13. Caulerpa taxifolia in Japan... slug food?
    From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 27, 2002
  14. Caulerpa taxifolia - economical consequences
    From: Hennes Zitzen, September 16, 2001
  15. Re: Oxynoe and Caulerpa taxifolia
    From: Cynthia Trowbridge, March 20, 2001
  16. Oxynoe and Caulerpa taxifolia
    From: French students, March 16, 2001
  17. Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
    From: Kathe R. Jensen, July 23, 2000
  18. Thanks
    From: James Cobb, July 23, 2000
  19. Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
    From: Cynthia Trowbridge, July 22, 2000
  20. Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
    From: Kathe R. Jensen, July 21, 2000
  21. Re: Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
    From: Dr. Cynthia Trowbridge, July 18, 2000
  22. Sacoglossans vs Caulerpa taxifolia
    From: James Cobb, July 17, 2000

Show factsheet and all related messages